<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27932062.post2737595058044415491..comments</id><updated>2007-10-29T10:34:58.342Z</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Centre for European Reform: Of mice, men and the language of EU reform</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://centreforeuropeanreform.blogspot.com/feeds/2737595058044415491/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27932062/2737595058044415491/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://centreforeuropeanreform.blogspot.com/2007/07/of-mice-men-and-language-of-eu-reform.html'/><author><name>Centre for European Reform</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06815454225955436329</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27932062.post-4539152421540361189</id><published>2007-07-23T11:40:00.000Z</published><updated>2007-07-23T11:40:00.000Z</updated><title type='text'>The return to business is usual is an important el...</title><content type='html'>The return to business is usual is an important element to highlight.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;After agreeing that things could "never again" be done the same as at Nice, and getting as far as at least some kind of public process via the convention, we are back in the Intergovernmental darkness again.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Amato is right to point out that that, at least, is a retrograde step.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27932062/2737595058044415491/comments/default/4539152421540361189'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27932062/2737595058044415491/comments/default/4539152421540361189'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://centreforeuropeanreform.blogspot.com/2007/07/of-mice-men-and-language-of-eu-reform.html?showComment=1185190800000#c4539152421540361189' title=''/><author><name>Hilary Bray</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://centreforeuropeanreform.blogspot.com/2007/07/of-mice-men-and-language-of-eu-reform.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27932062.post-2737595058044415491' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27932062/posts/default/2737595058044415491' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27932062.post-3819225556823016636</id><published>2007-07-18T16:28:00.000Z</published><updated>2007-07-18T16:28:00.000Z</updated><title type='text'>Do you regard the new version of the constitution ...</title><content type='html'>Do you regard the new version of the constitution as being radically different to the original?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;If so why are all of the following wrong?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Germany&lt;BR/&gt;“The substance of the constitution is preserved. That is a fact.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Angela Merkel, German Chancellor, Telegraph, 29 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Ireland&lt;BR/&gt;“90 per cent of it is still there... these changes haven't made any dramatic change to the substance of what was agreed back in 2004.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Bertie Ahern, Irish Taoiseach, Irish Independent, 24 June 2007) &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Czech Republic &lt;BR/&gt;“Only cosmetic changes have been made and the basic document remains the same.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Vaclav Klaus, Czech President, Guardian, 13 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Spain &lt;BR/&gt;“A great part of the content of the European Constitution is captured in the new treaties.”&lt;BR/&gt;(Jose Zapatero, Spanish PM, El Pais 23 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Finland&lt;BR/&gt;“There’s nothing from the original institutional package that has been changed.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Astrid Thors, Finnish Europe Minister, TV-Nytt, 23 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Denmark&lt;BR/&gt;“The good thing is...that all the symbolic elements are gone, and that which really matters – the core – is left.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Danish PM, Jyllands-Posten, 25 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Austria&lt;BR/&gt;“The original Treaty for a Constitution was maintained in substance.”&lt;BR/&gt;(Austrian government website, 25 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Belgium&lt;BR/&gt;The new treaty “takes up the most important elements of the constitutional treaty project.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Guy Verhofstadt, Belgian PM, Agence Europe, 24 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Italy&lt;BR/&gt;“As for our conditions… I outlined four red lines with respect to the text of the Constitution: to keep a permanent president of the EU, to keep the single overseer for foreign policy and a common diplomatic service, to keep the extension of majority voting, to keep the single legal personality of the Union. All of this has stayed.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Romano Prodi, Italian PM, La Repubblica, 24 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Lithuania&lt;BR/&gt;Lithuania has “100 percent fulfilled the tasks set forth before the meeting, including the primary objective of preserving the substance of the Constitutional Treaty.”&lt;BR/&gt;(Office of the President of Lithuania, official press release)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Luxemburg&lt;BR/&gt;“The substance has been preserved from Luxembourg’s point of view.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Jean-Claude Juncker, Luxemburg PM, Agence Europe, 24 June)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Slovenia&lt;BR/&gt;With the new treaty, the EU gets “content that is not essentially different from the constitutional treaty… All key institutional solutions remain… Some symbolic elements will be cleared up and some formulations toned down.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Janez Jansa, Slovenian PM, 23 June 2007, Slovenian Government Communication Office)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The European Commission&lt;BR/&gt;“It’s essentially the same proposal as the old Constitution.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Margot Wallstrom, EU Commissioner, Svenska Dagbladet, 26 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The author of the EU Constitution &lt;BR/&gt;“This text is, in fact, a rerun of a great part of the substance of the Constitutional Treaty.” &lt;BR/&gt;(Valery Giscard d’Estaing, Telegraph, 27 June 2007)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;European Parliament&lt;BR/&gt;The European Parliament “welcomes the fact that the mandate safeguards the substance of the Constitutional treaty.” &lt;BR/&gt;(European Parliament resolution, 10 July 2007)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27932062/2737595058044415491/comments/default/3819225556823016636'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27932062/2737595058044415491/comments/default/3819225556823016636'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://centreforeuropeanreform.blogspot.com/2007/07/of-mice-men-and-language-of-eu-reform.html?showComment=1184776080000#c3819225556823016636' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://centreforeuropeanreform.blogspot.com/2007/07/of-mice-men-and-language-of-eu-reform.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27932062.post-2737595058044415491' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27932062/posts/default/2737595058044415491' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>